Skip to Content
  • Thu Feb 23 2012
  • Welcome Guest!

Live Users (last hour): 197
Registered Users: 159,315

Tajikistan gives some territory to China

http://centralasianewswire.com/Tajikistan/Tajikistan-gives-China-land-to...

Do you think China has the right to claim this after more than 100 years? At first China claimed 20% of the country but settled for 390 sq miles.

I love my planet Vulcan. I'm proud of being a Vulcan in the universe.


Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

Quote:
It is unknown how many Tajik citizens live in the region to be ceded to China.

Territorial dispute over the Pamir district dates back to the time when Czarist Russia controlled Tajikistan.

I'm certain those nice shepherds will enjoy becoming Chinese.

China has more pigs than America has people.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

I think within 200 years, China, Koreas, Japan and Taiwan, also probably the southeastern countries might form some federation thing, not like an European Union way, more like a like country.

Sigh.

Bottlenecking

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

Odd, isn't it? China claims anything at all, and you Westerners go pissing vitroil and shitting hot lead ingots. Yet, since the days of Woodrow Wilson, the U.S. government( and its 走狗, England)have claimed an almost unlimited right to go adjusting the world's boundaries as they see fit. A test for you: try telling any politically astute American Indian that he has no right to continue whining after the wrongs he suffered hit the hundred year mark. Till you've done that, stay the hell out of forums where all you can do is whine about how evil the Cuinese are.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

tommypalooka wrote:
Odd, isn't it? China claims anything at all, and you Westerners go pissing vitroil and shitting hot lead ingots. Yet, since the days of Woodrow Wilson, the U.S. government( and its 走狗, England)have claimed an almost unlimited right to go adjusting the world's boundaries as they see fit. A test for you: try telling any politically astute American Indian that he has no right to continue whining after the wrongs he suffered hit the hundred year mark. Till you've done that, stay the hell out of forums where all you can do is whine about how evil the Cuinese are.

No American Indian has any right to complain about any suffering that his ancestors may have experienced. The plight of the American Indian today is not in any way related to his ancestors. This is very unlike the plight of people in Xizang and Xinjiang who are harmed by the policies of this country today as they have been for centuries in the past.

美国鬼子

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

Not that I agree with Tommy, but zhenlai, your post itself seems quite double-standard, care to elaborate?

Bottlenecking

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

KZ wrote:
Not that I agree with Tommy, but zhenlai, your post itself seems quite double-standard, care to elaborate?

There is no double standard. The people we call American Indians have much more freedom and more opportunity than the people in the western most parts of China. American Indians are still allowed to practice their culture without interference and they are still American citizens.

There are individual nations of Indian tribes within the country of The United States. They have sovereignty over the area given to them by The U.S.

Can the people of the western most areas controlled by China say this? I think not. Their culture and normal way of life is not respected. They are controlled and governed by ethnic Chinese who are not native to the area. They have no say in how this area is developed and are not allowed the opportunity to develop in the way that they see fit.

美国鬼子

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

tommypalooka wrote:
Odd, isn't it? China claims anything at all, and you Westerners go pissing vitroil and shitting hot lead ingots. Yet, since the days of Woodrow Wilson, the U.S. government( and its 走狗, England)have claimed an almost unlimited right to go adjusting the world's boundaries as they see fit. A test for you: try telling any politically astute American Indian that he has no right to continue whining after the wrongs he suffered hit the hundred year mark. Till you've done that, stay the hell out of forums where all you can do is whine about how evil the Cuinese are.

If you click on the linked article and read it or use the scroll function and read the posts prior to yours you will find an incredible lack of vitriol being pissed or lead ingots being sh*t, so what are you going on about?

I have a couple of good friends that are Native Americans(they can be considered politically astute) and I have no recollection of any whining being done by them, but then again they are off the res.

China has more pigs than America has people.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

So, how long had this bit of territory been Chinese prior to these hundred years it was Tajik?

Just asking.

You live you learn.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

zhenlai wrote:
The plight of the American Indian today is not in any way related to his ancestors.

I do find it odd that you seem to be determined to exclude history with regard to present day situations in many instances around the world. Please explain something to me, when does this cut of point get reached and why. Do we say give it 100 years or 4 or 5 generations. What is the criteria for deciding when history can no longer be considered a factor?

Ndiri Dread! handina sinhi kamudzanga!

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

BeijingBloke wrote:
zhenlai wrote:
The plight of the American Indian today is not in any way related to his ancestors.

I do find it odd that you seem to be determined to exclude history with regard to present day situations in many instances around the world. Please explain something to me, when does this cut of point get reached and why. Do we say give it 100 years or 4 or 5 generations. What is the criteria for deciding when history can no longer be considered a factor?

It ended at the same time as it always does for certain groups of people. My Irish ancestors were treated like they were slaves for a long time in the U.S. but now having an Irish background is a source of pride.

The Indians and the blacks have been accepted by society. Now it is their job to make that acceptance stronger and stronger. It is not for the white man to feel guilty for the sins of his forefathers.

GET OVER IT! MAKE YOUR OWN WAY AND STOP BITCHING AND MOANING ABOUT THE WAY YOUR ANCESTORS WERE TREATED.

This is your world and only you can change it. Crying about the past will never change the present or the future.

美国鬼子

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

So your take on why blacks and native Americans among other minorities in the US remain marginalized is because they simply need to make that acceptance stronger and stronger?

Care to elaborate there do you? If you can do provide practical ways to make this happen because making that acceptance stronger and stronger isn't the most convincing argument.

Ndiri Dread! handina sinhi kamudzanga!

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

KZ wrote:
I think within 200 years, China, Koreas, Japan and Taiwan, also probably the southeastern countries might form some federation thing, not like an European Union way, more like a like country.

Sigh.

HOw KZ? Silly

At the end of your life, you will regret the stuff you didn't do more than the stuff that you did.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

zhenlai wrote:
Can the people of the western most areas controlled by China say this? I think not. Their culture and normal way of life is not respected. They are controlled and governed by ethnic Chinese who are not native to the area. They have no say in how this area is developed and are not allowed the opportunity to develop in the way that they see fit.

As a matter of fact, xinjiang and Tibetan people do have their say in governing those areas, it is said in the law. Why in the past most government afficials in Xinjiang and Tibet are Hans? Because the locals are not educated, you cannot let a illiterate be a ruler, can you? That is why these days, many Tibetans and Xijiangers go to universities in Beijing and other big cities to learn Mandarin, law and agricultural science, etc. When they graduate, law graduates can take the national civil servants' test to work in law inforcement, while agricultural science students can grow corps with advanced science and technologies, etc.

At the end of your life, you will regret the stuff you didn't do more than the stuff that you did.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

What's wrong with letting them study their own language and culture?

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

Well, how many Hans officials speak Tibetans?

You live you learn.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

walls wrote:
http://centralasianewswire.com/Tajikistan/Tajikistan-gives-China-land-to-settle-century-old-dispute/viewstory.aspx?id=2918

Do you think China has the right to claim this after more than 100 years? At first China claimed 20% of the country but settled for 390 sq miles.

My Government says Tajikistanm owns China 28.5 thousand square kilometers of Territory but only returned ONE thousand square kilometres! Silly

At the end of your life, you will regret the stuff you didn't do more than the stuff that you did.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

alishan wrote:
Well, how many Hans officials speak Tibetans?

Alishan, I saw on TV the other day, an old Han spoke fluent Tibetan after spending half of his life in the Tibetan government.

I think, why should Tibetans learn Mandarin? Because policies and laws released by central authorities are IN MANDARIN. So as a governor, you must be able to read and translate them to your native language and then make public.

At the end of your life, you will regret the stuff you didn't do more than the stuff that you did.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

Then you've just said yourself, he's a translator.... not a guvernor.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

Herbie wrote:
What's wrong with letting them study their own language and culture?

There is nothing wrong with that, Herbie. Cowboy I do think China is lacking in formal schools or universities that teach and maintain their culture and customs. The government should have built more schools and Universites in southern Xinjiang, where the minorities live. On the other hand, the harsh fact is, As an average Tibetan or Xijianger, if you don't accept the reality, bow down to Han government and study hard to change your life completely, you will forever remain a poor Nang seller! I feel sorry for that!

At the end of your life, you will regret the stuff you didn't do more than the stuff that you did.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

sereneselchie wrote:
alishan wrote:
Well, how many Hans officials speak Tibetans?

Alishan, I saw on TV the other day, an old Han spoke fluent Tibetan after spending half of his life in the Tibetan government.

I think, why should Tibetans learn Mandarin? Because policies and laws released by central authorities are IN MANDARIN. So as a governor, you must be able to read and translate them to your native language and then make public.

I understand perfectly. Other countries like France imposed French on local and overseas populations as the official language letting die dialects by forbidden their teaching and their spread especially after WWII. Dialects and other regional languages have been back on the agenda since a chart in favor of minor European languages was implemented in 1995.

Back to China. So far you saw ONE guy speaking fluent Tibetan but if the government officials were more open and learn at lease one other minor Chinese dialect/language, don't you think it would make a difference? A sort of mutual effort. In the case of Tibet and Xinjiang, that could make a huge difference in their relations I think.

You live you learn.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

Its funny how the Chinese with all this talk of the Middle Kingdom etc etc would be the last people to take kindly to foreign occupation. Just look at the unpopularity of the Japanese to this day and all the pouting and gesturing China did till the Brits gave them back Hong Kong. However when it comes to Tibet and Xinjiang seeking self determination it becomes all about those poor simple Uighur and Tibetans they need their fellow Han countrymen to tell them what to do coz frankly if left to their own devices they are liable to climb up the nearest trees and start flinging their own feces at each other.

Ndiri Dread! handina sinhi kamudzanga!

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

BeijingBloke wrote:
Its funny how the Chinese with all this talk of the Middle Kingdom etc etc would be the last people to take kindly to foreign occupation. Just look at the unpopularity of the Japanese to this day and all the pouting and gesturing China did till the Brits gave them back Hong Kong. However when it comes to Tibet and Xinjiang seeking self determination it becomes all about those poor simple Uighur and Tibetans they need their fellow Han countrymen to tell them what to do coz frankly if left to their own devices they are liable to climb up the nearest trees and start flinging their own feces at each other.

Brilliant.

On a slightly related note, I recently taught some students a "2010 review" class. One of the points was "North Korea attacks South Korea."

All my students said, "No, no... South Korea attacked North Korea!!" (as reported in the media)

WTF?????????????? Surprise

Remmy be pimpin' in BJ, yo!

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

RemmyM wrote:
BeijingBloke wrote:
Its funny how the Chinese with all this talk of the Middle Kingdom etc etc would be the last people to take kindly to foreign occupation. Just look at the unpopularity of the Japanese to this day and all the pouting and gesturing China did till the Brits gave them back Hong Kong. However when it comes to Tibet and Xinjiang seeking self determination it becomes all about those poor simple Uighur and Tibetans they need their fellow Han countrymen to tell them what to do coz frankly if left to their own devices they are liable to climb up the nearest trees and start flinging their own feces at each other.

Brilliant.

On a slightly related note, I recently taught some students a "2010 review" class. One of the points was "North Korea attacks South Korea."

All my students said, "No, no... South Korea attacked North Korea!!" (as reported in the media)

WTF?????????????? Surprise

Yes, they seem to all read the exact news articles. But it takes too much effort sometimes to try to explain the other side. So tiring Sad

I love my planet Vulcan. I'm proud of being a Vulcan in the universe.

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

tommypalooka wrote:
A test for you: try telling any politically astute American Indian that he has no right to continue whining after the wrongs he suffered hit the hundred year mark. Till you've done that, stay the hell out of forums where all you can do is whine about how evil the Chinese are.

I guess I pass your test since I have actually told modern American Indians to stop whining and playing victim. Cool That's a topic for another thread.

As for the "evil Chinese", the article states the land dispute is long standing and they have been actively negotiating it, so it's not like the Chinese restarted/created a claim from 500 years ago. Seems to me Tajikistan knows it will be in the Chinese economic sphere for the future, so let's buy a little peace cheaply with the big guy in the neighborhood.

-------------------------------------
** Playing Between The Bars **

Re: Tajikistan gives some territory to China

RemmyM wrote:

Brilliant.

On a slightly related note, I recently taught some students a "2010 review" class. One of the points was "North Korea attacks South Korea."

All my students said, "No, no... South Korea attacked North Korea!!" (as reported in the media)

WTF?????????????? Surprise

Well don't you know south Korea is the evil country threatening the happy hard working and prosperous people of NK?

You should read a book sometime Wink

"I lived 3 years in China and survived Fukushima, and all I had was this stupid leukemia"

Copyright 2009 True Run Media. All Rights Reserved. 京ICP备11039980
Powered by CANDIS Infrastructure Services