why was Russia leading prior to WW2 and have been shitty since?

12 posts / 0 new
Last post

they were so cool in terms of space technologies, heavy industry, national defence...blablabla

until ww2 since where their economy and world status drop like 99% to the level of countries liek fijii

now they only have suicidal mens, 300 pounds women, vodka, preteen porno and king Putin

why? are they white? bad genes?

they so big, but so bad.why?!?!

their neighbour like turky, hungry, are far more better than them

wtf!

holasho!

Bomb

dex, booby, ...blablalba..you name it, i have it! they gave me so much nicknames

dam laowai nigas

not that shitty as you are , dex.

......

javajoeLovesZhenlaiSciency wrote:

they were so cool in terms of space technologies, heavy industry, national defence...blablabla

until ww2 since where their economy and world status drop like 99% to the level of countries liek fijii

now they only have suicidal mens, 300 pounds women, vodka, preteen porno and king Putin

why? are they white? bad genes?

they so big, but so bad.why?!?!

their neighbour like turky, hungry, are far more better than them

wtf!

holasho!

Bomb

Uh...WTF? Russia published a lot of bullshit in the 1930's about progress. Famine was not uncommon. The U.S. sent them one hell of a lot of military equipment for the war. The chassis for their best tanks was built under Ford auspicies. One of their two best fighter-planes was the U.S. P-39. As the ol' saying goes, WW2 was won with Russian blood and American steel.

As for why they failed, under strongly centralized planning there was too much incentive to lie and coverup problems.

Read some Russian history written by neutral sources before you embarrass yourself like this again.

Smog is the price of life in Beijing; terrorism the rent for living in London. Got it!

In the entire JJLCS post, not one single assertion or implication is even ballpark true. This is just a cry for attention.

JB275 wrote:

In the entire JJLCS post, not one single assertion or implication is even ballpark true. This is just a cry for attention.

Hmmmm...I suppose being tarred and feathered is a form of attention, is it not?

Smog is the price of life in Beijing; terrorism the rent for living in London. Got it!

While we're on the subject, which side was Russia on in WWII?

In the hopes of dissolving some of the JJLZS disinformation, here is a totally objective timeline of WWII, which ignores tons of detail and which different people may interpret differently.

8/23/39: German/Russian non-aggression pact.

9/31/39: Germany invades Poland.

9/17/39: Russia invades Poland.

5/10/40: Germany invades France

5/27/40: Britain evacuates Dunkirk

7/10/40: Battle of Britain commences

10/31/40: Germany withdraws from Battle of Britain

6/22/41: Germany invades Russia

5/7/45: Germany surrenders

8/6/45: Hiroshima

8/9/45: Nagasaki

8/9/45: Russia declares war on Japan

8/15/45: Japan announces surrender.

So you see, WWII was begun jointly by Germany & Russia with their invasion of Poland in the summer of 1939, then Hitler suddenly turned on Stalin in June of 1941 and Russia became one of the allies, declaring war on Japan 6 days before her surrender.

So, which side was Russia on? You tell me. Everyone is entitled to his own opinion (but not to his own facts).

thanks JB. you = jj = historian

but in my mind, which is smart: i think russia = tanks + vodka with sucidal mens and descrmiinated womens, earning a montly income of $100 and molested by Putin in winter in snow

this is my history

very good!

Bye

dex, booby, ...blablalba..you name it, i have it! they gave me so much nicknames

dam laowai nigas

dex, after being x-rayed, you should admit in public that you are sick not only in mind.

......

JB275 wrote:

While we're on the subject, which side was Russia on in WWII?

In the hopes of dissolving some of the JJLZS disinformation, here is a totally objective timeline of WWII, which ignores tons of detail and which different people may interpret differently.

8/23/39: German/Russian non-aggression pact.

9/31/39: Germany invades Poland.

9/17/39: Russia invades Poland.

5/10/40: Germany invades France

5/27/40: Britain evacuates Dunkirk

7/10/40: Battle of Britain commences

10/31/40: Germany withdraws from Battle of Britain

6/22/41: Germany invades Russia

5/7/45: Germany surrenders

8/6/45: Hiroshima

8/9/45: Nagasaki

8/9/45: Russia declares war on Japan

8/15/45: Japan announces surrender.

So you see, WWII was begun jointly by Germany & Russia with their invasion of Poland in the summer of 1939, then Hitler suddenly turned on Stalin in June of 1941 and Russia became one of the allies, declaring war on Japan 6 days before her surrender.

So, which side was Russia on? You tell me. Everyone is entitled to his own opinion (but not to his own facts).

Thier own side mostly, which should not be too shocking. Harry Truman, while still a Senator, suggested that the U.S. should back "whichever side is losing at the moment" when dealing with the Third Reich/USSR contremps. Again: self-interest.

Solzhenitsyn (in "The First Cricle") notes that Stalin "had only ever trusted one man, and that man let him down. That man was Adolph Hitler."

Still and all, not to make too much of this error in character judgement. The Russians did bear the brunt of the fighting versus the Krauts. I mean, more German tanks were destroyed at Kursk than the Germans ever even fielded on the Western Front.

Smog is the price of life in Beijing; terrorism the rent for living in London. Got it!

javajoeLovesZhenlaiSciency wrote:

thanks JB. you = jj = historian

but in my mind, which is smart: i think russia = tanks + vodka with sucidal mens and descrmiinated womens, earning a montly income of $100 and molested by Putin in winter in snow

this is my history

very good!

Bye

That is $100 in EXCHANGE. Locally it goes a good deal further.

Smog is the price of life in Beijing; terrorism the rent for living in London. Got it!

And Kursk was in the Ukraine, which then, unlike now, did not incude the Crimea, the home of Russia's only warm water port (which the US apparently thinks Russia should abandon, but which Rrussia will never.)

i'd imagine catwoman is an exception and superior russian gal, but mostly, russia is like this:

russian mens drive trucks in laowai land:

ugly buildings with icecream-coned tops:

russian grandmas with boobs of size XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXL

every russian gal =long legged hookers

shavapova is now too old and married USA:

russian gals' faced are different than other white races in an ugly way:

Facist Putin is alive and happily living as a king

country too poor with nothing buy vodka and missicle launching vehicles

worse GNSS network: GLONASS, which is even worse than the chinese COMPASS/Beidou GNSS. much worse than GPS

leaders get gun downed in broad daylight in the captal of the country:

dex, booby, ...blablalba..you name it, i have it! they gave me so much nicknames

dam laowai nigas