1. In the original story of the Good Samaritan, the Good Samaritan picked the guy up off the road, administered such emergency care as was needed on the site (he treated the guy's wound's and poured in Oil and Wine [which of course is another symbolism]), supplied the hurting man's real needs effectively. The good Samaritan took the guy to the equivalent of a hospital and paid for all the medical care and left a further promise to take care of any expenses. The Good Samaritan took on the full responsibility for the hurt man's care without restraint or complaint. There was nothing superficial about what the original Good Samaritan did. He paid the guy's bills willingly and offered to provide more as necessary. The Good Samaritan cut through all of the crap. He fully engaged in the injured man's care.
2. Schwanker points out correctly that the situation in the US with lawyers and parasites is so bad that an actual law is required to protect those who help and restraint them as well. In a Utopian police state like the US is, you aren't even allowed to provide CPR unless you have had training.
3. Schwanker wants us to believe that the Peng Yu case in Nanjing typifies the national scene in China. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Peng Yu case made the news because it is outrageous. I saw this week a three-wheeled cart turn over and people who saw it rushed in to help and make sure that everyone was ok. Where there is a sort of natural law that governs people there ain't much of a need for barristers and other bastards.